Legal Opinion

Wendell v. Lebon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 20, 1883PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Clay county, McKelry, J., presiding, (acting for the judge of the 11th district,) dissolving an attachment. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The questions involved in this appeal relate to the constitutionality of certain provisions of chapter 148, Laws 1881, entitled “An act to prevent debtors from giving preference to creditors, and to secure the equal distribution of the property of debtors among their creditors, and for the release of debts against debtors,” passed March 7, 1881, and which took effect July 1st of the same year. A reference to the law itself will be necessary to a full understanding of the case. Suffice it to say here that the act in its essential features is a bankrupt law. Section 1 provides for what may be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. Suydam v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. Boyle v. ZacharieSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. Ames v. Lake Superior & Mississippi RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Risser v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Bond v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. In re MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. McClure v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API