In re Mann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Creditors’ petition in insolvency, in tbe district court for Ramsey county. The petitioners, after alleging the insolvency of the debtor Henry E. Mann, a trader residing and doing business in that county, their own claims against him, etc., state that on January 14, 1884, in actions brought against him in the United States circuit court for Minnesota, one James A. Owens, who had property of Mann in his hands to an amount exceeding $15,000, and was indebted to Mann in an…
Read the full summary
Creditors’ petition in insolvency, in tbe district court for Ramsey county. The petitioners, after alleging the insolvency of the debtor Henry E. Mann, a trader residing and doing business in that county, their own claims against him, etc., state that on January 14, 1884, in actions brought against him in the United States circuit court for Minnesota, one James A. Owens, who had property of Mann in his hands to an amount exceeding $15,000, and was indebted to Mann in an amount exceeding $25, was summoned as garnishee, and required to appear and make disclosure on June 16,1884. That more than…
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
Our insolvent law (Law's 1881, e. 148) authorizes a debtor whose property is levied upon, directly or by garnishment, to make an assignment of all his unexempt property for the equal bene*62fit of all his creditors, (in proportion to their respective claims,) who shall file releases of their debts and claims against him with the clerk of the proper court. Section 1. Section 10 enacts that no creditor of any insolvent debtor shall receive any benefit under the act, unless he has first filed, with the clerk of the proper district court, a release to the debtor of all claims other than such as may…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brashear v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Wintringham v. LafoyNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- Leon & H. Blum v. WelborneTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Wendell v. LebonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Conkling v. CarsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- State ex rel. Enderlin State Bank v. RoseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Wright v. LeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- Houston Nat. Exch. Bank v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- McClure v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.