Legal Opinion

Hammonds v. Flewellen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1932No. 4078PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevi, J.

(after stating the facts as above).

There is presented on appeal the points in view, in effect, that the lessor may not assert failure of compliance of the lease provision to pay the rental within the time limited, of December 1, 1930, and defeat the lessee’s right in the lease, because (1) the lessor consented to the deferment of rental payment until the termination of a suit to be instituted to remove the claim and existence of incum-brance upon the premises of an outstanding gas and oil lease, and (2) the circumstances are sufficient to constitute estoppel as the lessor by acts and conduct…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Texas Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DavisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cox v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Richards v. Frick-Reid Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Hogan v. W. H. Norris Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Mecom v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Richards v. Frick-Reid Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API