Mecom v. Gallagher
Court of Appeals of Texas
1ConcurrencePrice, Chief Justice
I concur in the disposition made of this case, but n'ot with everything said in Justice SUTTON’S opinion.
Plaintiff’s substantial right was an option for 30 days to buy the property for what the Gutierrez heirs were willing to sell to a third party. This option was sufficiently definite to amount to a legal right. Pickrell v. Buckler, Tex.Civ.App., 293 S.W. 667; Id., 116 Tex. 567, 296 S.W. 1062. It is my thought the right to purchase was substantially accorded him. The notice served upon him might not have been in strict accord with the provisions of the lease. Pie never questioned the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Pickrell v. BucklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Longbotham v. LeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Hart v. WilsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Hammonds v. FlewellenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.