Legal Opinion

Dean v. Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 18, 2006No. AC 26372PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

This appeal concerns the operational relationship between the Coastal Management Act, codified in General Statutes §§ 22a-90 through 22a-112, and local land use regulations. The act authorizes local zoning commissions to undertake “a single review process, during which proposals for development within the coastal boundary will simultaneously be reviewed for compliance with local zoning requirements and for consistency with the policies of planned coastal management.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 266 Conn.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Leabo v. LeninskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Municipal Funding, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dean-Moss Family Ltd. Partnership v. Five Mile River Works, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Zirinsky v. Carnegie Hill Capital Asset Management, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Dean v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API