Legal Opinion
Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission of New London
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 21, 2003No. SC 16932; SC 16933PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
This opinion addresses two appeals arising ont of a similar factual background. The plaintiff, Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC, appeals from two judgments of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs appeals from two coastal site plan reviews conducted by the defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the city of New London (commission), pursuant to the Coastal Management Act (act), General Statutes § 22a-90 et seq. The plaintiff contends that the trial court improperly dismissed its appeals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the plaintiff claims…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carmel Hollow Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. GarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Pond View, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.