Leabo v. Leninski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
This appeal is from an action brought by the plaintiffs seeking to quiet title and to enjoin the defendant from opening a beach for public use, and for damages. After the issues were found for the plaintiffs the defendant appealed.
On the appeal, the defendant maintains that the court erred (1) in the criteria it applied in determining the plaintiffs’ easement rights; (2) in finding irreparable injury; (3) in concluding that the policy of public access to beaches did not affect the rights and duties of the parties; and (4) in concluding that the defendant acted with malice.
The following facts…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Thornton v. HayOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Seaway Co. v. Attorney General of the StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- In Re Application of AshfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Klein v. DoveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Kuras v. KopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Holson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Middletown Commercial Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Goold v. GooldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.