Legal Opinion

Zirinsky v. Carnegie Hill Capital Asset Management, LLC

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 25, 2012No. AC 33412PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The defendants, Carnegie Hill Capital Asset Management, LLC (Carnegie), Michael Jamison and Janice Jamison, appeal from the judgment of the trial court in this easement dispute between neighbors. They claim that the court improperly concluded that (1) the easement in question precluded the plaintiff, Bruce Zirinisky, from planting only those trees in the easement area that blocked their access to an abutting park and playground area and (2) the play system erected in the easement area by the defendants is a permanent structure prohibited under the terms of the easement. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Stone-Krete Construction, Inc. v. EderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Johnson v. Charles William Palomba Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. American Brass Co. v. SerraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 57 Broad Street Stamford, LLC v. Summer House Owners, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Avery v. MedinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. NPC Offices, LLC v. KowaleskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API