Legal Opinion

Cable v. Bic Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 2, 2003No. AC 22840PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendants, Bic Corporation (Bic) and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, appeal from the finding and award of the workers’ compensation commissioner rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Jacqueline Cable, on her discriminatory discharge claim. On appeal, the defendants claim that the commissioner (1) failed to articulate the basis of the alleged discrimination, (2) applied the incorrect evidentiary standard by failing to apply the correct burden shifting analysis and (3) improperly concluded that the plaintiff met her burden of proof.1 We affirm the commissioner’s decision.

In…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Hartford Courant Co. v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Chiaia v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  5. Haynes v. BronsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cable v. Bic Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Moran v. Media News Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Cable v. BIC Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API