Legal Opinion
Mele v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 31, 2004No. SC 17127PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the determination of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the first district (commissioner) that the defendant discriminated against the plaintiff for exercising rights afforded to her under the Workers’ Compensation Act (act) in violation of General Statutes § Sl-^Oa. The defendant, the city of Hartford, appeals 2 from the commissioner’s decision in favor of the plaintiff, Lydia Mele, claiming, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient to prove that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kathleen M. Cifra v. General Electric Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation, as Its SuccessorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Brittell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Echavarria v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Edward Tuohy v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Moran v. Media News Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Chuckta v. AsijaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Valdes v. Yankee Casting Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.