Legal Opinion

Miller v. Johnson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1926No. File No. 5577PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORIARTY, C.

This action was brought by appellant to recover on a promissory note. The complaint is in the usual form for an action on a note, sued upon by the original payee. Respondent, in his answer, admits the signing and delivery of the note, but pleads as a defense total failure of consideration.

The record shows little or no conflict of evidence material to the issues.

The facts are as fallows: In the month of April, 1919, appellant was engaged in the real estate 'business at Miller. About April 9th of that year negotiations between the parties to the action resulted in their entering…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Langford v. IssenhuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hogle v. MeyeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Friar v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Jensen v. BowenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Farmer v. HolmesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hurney v. LockeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Island v. HelmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Feldmeyer v. EngelhartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Kerr v. BashamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kadlec v. LangloisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API