Legal Opinion

United States v. Mollner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2011No. 19-1313PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Christopher Noah Mollner pleaded guilty to armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113. Pri- or to sentencing, the district court granted the government’s motion to compel Mr. Mollner to testify at the trial of his co-defendant, Ira Burdell Wakefield, and to grant Mr. Mollner immunity for his testimony. However, Mr. Mollner refused to testify. At Mr. Mollner’s sentencing hearing, the district court adjusted his offense level upward by two levels for obstruction of justice under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.”) § 3C1.1 based upon…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. GanttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. FinnesyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. HallidayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. CassiusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API