United States v. Mollner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Christopher Noah Mollner pleaded guilty to armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113. Pri- or to sentencing, the district court granted the government’s motion to compel Mr. Mollner to testify at the trial of his co-defendant, Ira Burdell Wakefield, and to grant Mr. Mollner immunity for his testimony. However, Mr. Mollner refused to testify. At Mr. Mollner’s sentencing hearing, the district court adjusted his offense level upward by two levels for obstruction of justice under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.”) § 3C1.1 based upon…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. GanttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. FinnesyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. HallidayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. CassiusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.