Legal Opinion
United States v. Ramos
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 27, 2012No. 11-3126PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Armando Ramos attacks in this appeal the legal validity of his sentence for receipt of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and dismiss the appeal in part for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
I
Mr. Ramos was indicted by a federal grand jury in Kansas on two counts relating to the receipt and possession of child pornography. The charges arose out of an investigation that began with a tip from German authorities who were “policing the [eJDonkey peer-to-peer file sharing network and observed a known…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. ReingoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Askia WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. David HusmannCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.