Legal Opinion

United States v. Cassius

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2015No. 13-1367PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

For this appeal, we must decide whether Alleyne v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013), allows a district court to enhance a criminal defendant’s Sentencing Guidelines range for a 21 U.S.C. § 841 conviction based on a judicial drug quantity finding greater than what the jury found at trial. We hold that, so long as the court does not use its own drug quantity finding to alter the defendant’s statutory sentencing range, such an enhancement is entirely consistent with Alleyne. Here, nothing indicates the trial court altered Defendant Timothy…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hopkins, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. United States v. Zar (Derek)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Garay-SierraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. BiglowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API