Legal Opinion

Kiley v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 10, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The defendant excepted to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict in its favor in an action of tort for negligently causing bodily injury. At its Brockton station the defendant maintained a covered passageway with a floor made of "a cement material having a trade name ‘terrazzo.’ ” In rainy weather the roof leaked and the floor became wet. The floor had settled in places, but one could hardly notice that unless there was water on the floor. On May 3, 1933, when the floor was wet, although the plaintiff did not feel any water under her feet, she “fell into ‘a lot of water,’” about a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tariff v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Pearson v. Director General of RailroadsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McVeigh v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963
  2. Correira v. Atlantic Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Sellew v. Tuttle's Millinery Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Moors v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Battista v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API