Legal Opinion

Battista v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 25, 1944PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This is an action of tort for injuries received by the plaintiff, a prospective customer, from a fall *180in an entrance to the defendant’s store in Clinton. The case was referred to an auditor, his findings of fact to be final. The judge ordered that judgment be entered for the plaintiff on the auditor’s report, and the defendant appealed.

The duty of the judge was to order the correct judgment on the facts contained in the auditor’s report. Howland v. Stowe, 290 Mass. 142, 146. Redden v. Ramsey, 309 Mass. 225, 227. This we think was not done. The auditor found that there was no defect in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Howland v. StoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Pastrick v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Cromarty v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  4. Redden v. RamseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Tariff v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Aylward v. McCloskeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Soares v. Lakeville Baseball Camp, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Union Old Lowell National Bank v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Wallace v. JC Penny Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Jennie Athas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API