Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Director General of Railroads

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 23, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The plaintiff properly was allowed to amend her pleadings by substituting John Barton Payne, Director General of Railroads for the corporation originally named as defendant, and later by the substitution of James C. Davis, Director General of Railroads in place of his predecessor in that office. Aetna Mills v. Director General of *160Railroads, 242 Mass. 255. Genga v. Director General of Railroads, 243 Mass. 101.

The action is brought to recover for personal injuries’ received by the plaintiff in the waiting room of the station of the Boston and Maine Railroad in Boston, where she went for the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Goddard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Genga v. Director General of RailroadsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Norton v. HudnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Judson v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Hunnewell v. HaskellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Quigley v. Wilson Line of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Mascary v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Tariff v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Waugh v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Kiley v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API