Legal Opinion

Moors v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 30, 1940PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiffs Nellie T. Moors and Sarah A. Finneran are sisters. Their actions are for personal injuries sustained by each in the latter part of the afternoon of January 19, 1931, as a result of slipping and falling at approximately the same time and place near the bottom of the lowest of three flights of stairs leading to the lower level in the Summer Street station of the Boston subway. The other two actions are by the respective husbands of the plaintiffs first named to recover consequential damages. All the declarations rest upon alleged negligence of the defendant in keeping the stairs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tariff v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Seidenberg v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Labrie v. DonhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Kiley v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. MacLaren v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McVeigh v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963
  2. Brody v. Albert Lifson & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. Grace v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Battista v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Lanagan v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API