Legal Opinion
In Re Hartmann
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1938No. Crim. 1610PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
By means of a writ of habeas corpus the petitioner seeks to obtain his release -from custody. He is restrained of his liberty under a warrant of arrest issued from the police court of the city of Sacramento pursuant to a complaint which was filed against him in that court charging the petitioner with wilfully and unlawfully soliciting in that city subscriptions to magazines without first procuring from the chief of police a canvasser’s permit so to do, contrary to the provisions of Ordinance No. 166, fourth series, of that city, duly adopted and in force.
The ordinance which the petitioner is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sligh v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In re FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- E. A. Hoffman Candy Co. v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- In Re RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by19 opinions
- Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Rowe v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. AmdurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- In re MaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.