Legal Opinion
In re Mares
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 1946No. Crim. No. 2415PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
The petitioner seeks to be released from custody after his arrest for a violation of ordinance 2593 of the city and county of San Francisco which provides that, “No person shall on any public street or sidewalk ... or in any area or doorway or entrance-way immediately abutting thereon, solicit the sale to street and sidewalk traffic of any subscription to any magazine or periodical for future delivery, or the sale of any tangible personal property to be delivered to the purchaser thereof, or to any other person, at a subsequent time.” A violation is made a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Rowe v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Wade v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Slater v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Barajas v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.