Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Tanabe Corp.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 1999No. 21068PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

WATANABE, J.

In this appeal, Plaintiffs-Appellants Joseph A. Ryan (Joseph) and Helen B. Ryan (Helen) (collectively, the Ryans) contend that the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (the circuit court): (1) reversibly erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Tanabe Corporation (Tanabe), a Japan corporation, and Tanac Corporation (Tanac), a Hawaii corporation, (collectively, Defendants) and in ruling, as a matter of law, that the Ryans did not have an express or prescriptive easement over a portion of real property owned by Tanabe that had been…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bedlow v. New York Floating Dry Dock Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Gardner v. MaffittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 7455 Inc. v. Tuala Northwest, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Malulani Group, Ltd. v. Kaupo Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Oberlander v. HennequinMontana Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Husain v. California Pacific BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API