Legal Opinion
Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. Fujimoto
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1995No. 15460PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEIN, Justice.
We issued a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) in this case, which concerns a challenge by Public Access Shoreline Hawaii (PASH) and Angel Pilago to the Hawaii County Planning Commission’s (HPC) decision denying them standing to participate in a contested case hearing on an application by Nansay Hawaii, Inc. (Nansay) for a Special Management Area (SMA) use permit.
In order to pursue development of a resort complex on land within a SMA on the island of Hawaii (Big Island), Nansay applied to the HPC for a SMA use permit. PASH, an…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Hawaii Medical Ass'n v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Bush v. WatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Lingle v. Hawai'i Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME, Local 152Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- Severance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.