Legal Opinion

Hawkes Co. v. Cowart Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 12, 1917No. 8646PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint; from Calhoun superior court — Judge Cox. December 6, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. Under -repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court of our State, “No ground of a motion for new trial which is not complete and understandable without resorting to an examination of the brief of evidence or the charge of the court will be considered as presenting a question for consideration by this court.” Southern Railway Co. v. Williams, 19 Ga. App. 545 (91 S. E. 1001); Head v. State, 144 Ga. 383 (87 S. E. 273); Smiley v. Smiley, 144 Ga. 546 (87 S. E. 668). In the instant ease each special ground of the motion for new trial refers, to a certain written contract, but this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smiley v. SmileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Head v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Cooner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Williamson, Inman & Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Dillin v. United Roofing & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Sharpe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API