Legal Opinion

Smiley v. Smiley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1916PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Specific performance. Before Judge Sheppard. Liberty superior court. Au-S11^ 12, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

Exceptions pendente lite, though duly allowed and ordered filed as a part of the record, upon which no error was originally assigned in the main bill of exceptions, and upon which counsel made no assignment of error before the argument of the case, will not be considered by this court. Jones v. Kagan, 136 Ga. 653 (7), 655 (71 S. E. 1098); Atlantic & Birmingham R. Co. v. Penny, 119 Ga. 479 (46 S. E. 675); Civil Code, § 6138.

2. Grounds of a motion for new trial which are incomplete, and can not be understood without resorting to an examination of the brief of evidence, fail to present any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad v. PennySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Head v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Jones v. RaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Shropshire v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Tilley v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Alexander v. ChipsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Copeland v. RuffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Keith v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API