Legal Opinion

Sharpe v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 1925No. 16524Published

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. “Where evidence is offered and objected to, and a portion thereof is admissible and a part objectionable, unless the illegal portion, is specified and properly objected to, the whole will be admitted.” City of Atlanta v. Sciple, 19 Ga. App. 694 (3) (92 S. E. 28). “An assignment of error upon the admission of specified testimony is not well taken,, when part of it was admissible.” Murphy v. State, 122 Ga. 149 (7) (50 S. E. 48). The brief of evidence shows that the words, “That is the man that shot me; I am certain .of it; I know him,” were used at the time of the shooting of the witness,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. City of Atlanta v. ScipleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Hawkes Co. v. Cowart Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API