Legal Opinion

Williamson, Inman & Co. v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1935No. 24127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

The defendant company was sued for commissions alleged to be due for selling certain cotton, the plaintiff contending that the commissions became due when he procured acceptable purchasers for the cotton and a contract was entered into with them, although the cotton was not to be delivered and paid for until a later date. Defendant contended that such commissions were not due until the cotton was delivered and paid for; also that the purchasers procured by the plaintiff were insolvent at the time they entered into the contracts; that they were therefore unable to perform their contracts at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Payne v. PonderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Bell v. FeltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Baker v. StrawderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Macon Union Co-Operative Ass'n v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Hawkes Co. v. Cowart Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Williamson, Inman & Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Smith v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Brock v. CatoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  5. CONNER INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. v. StrauchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API