Cooner v. State

It is unnecessary to discuss all the exceptions covered by the foregoing headnotes. We deem it proper, however, to enlarge slightly on two of the headnotes.

*5411. The first four grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complain that the court erred in admitting certain testimony over the objections of counsel for the defendant, and, as stated in the headnote, the objections actually made at the time when the evidence was offered do not appear in these grounds of the motion for a new trial. The first ground recites that “the court erred by permitting and allowing the witness T. W.…