Legal Opinion
Nielsen v. Ford Motor Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 14, 1996No. 95CA006256PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Slaby, Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants are a group of licensed stationary engineers (“appellants”) who are employed by defendant-appellee, Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). They appeal the decision of the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas dismissing their case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of standing. We affirm.
Prior to 1993, Ford operated three coal-fired steam boilers which, under applicable provisions of R.C. Chapter 4739, required continuous monitoring by properly licensed stationary steam engineers. Appellants were assigned to monitor these boilers on a full-time basis. In…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fawcett v. G. C. Murphy & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Crull v. Maple Park Body ShopOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- New Boston Coke Corp. v. TylerOhio Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Mason v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Almendares v. PalmerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Save the Lake v. City of HillsboroOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- OMG MSTR LSCO, L.L.C. v. Dept. of MedicaidOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Upperman v. Grange Indemnity Insurance, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.