Legal Opinion

New Boston Coke Corp. v. Tyler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1987No. 86-1798PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The present action has been predicated upon what consideration, if any, the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency must afford the criteria prescribed by R.C. 3704.03(E)(1) through (3) in amending Ohio Adm. Code 3745-17-07(E)(4). It is the contention of appellant that the director was required to consider the factors set forth in the aforementioned statute prior to the promulgation of the ten percent particulate emission limitation contained in the rule. Appellee responds that such consideration is required only “to the extent consistent with the federal Clean Air Act.” R.C.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. General Motors Corp. v. McAvoyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. Columbus (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Foods v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API