Legal Opinion

Fawcett v. G. C. Murphy & Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1976No. Nos. 75-202, 75-203 and 75-204PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO ’Neill, C. J.

Common issues of law are presented in these three appeals and they are, therefore, consolidated herein for purposes of review.

Th first issue, as stated by appellants, is whether the “statutory policy” set forth in R. C. 4101.17 “must be implemented by Ohio courts in a private civil action for damages.”

R. C. 4101.17 reads:

“No employer shall refuse opportunity of interview for employment of applicants or discharge without just cause any employee between the ages of forty and sixty-five who are physically able to perform the duties and otherwise meet the established requirements of the industry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hahn v. KottenOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Anderson v. MinterOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Caverno v. FellowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Johnson v. Ætna Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Ross v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Josephine GAGNÉ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API