Legal Opinion

Upperman v. Grange Indemnity Insurance

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided November 15, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frye, Judge.

Introduction

{¶ 1} Pursuant to Civ.R. 12(C), defendants seek partial judgment on the pleadings. Defendants present three arguments in support of their motion. First, defendants argue that R.C. 3937.03 does not create a private right of action for the plaintiffs. Next, defendants assert that plaintiffs have not properly pleaded a fraud or fraudulent-concealment claim. Third, defendant Grange Mutual Casualty Company (“Grange”) asserts that it is the parent of two operating subsidiaries but that plaintiffs have failed to plead any facts that could lead to its liability for acts of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. R.E. Roark Companies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lena McClain v. Northwest Community Corrections Center Judicial Corrections BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Maple Hts. v. Netlix, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Siegfried v. Farmers Insurance of Columbus, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API