Legal Opinion
Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1991No. 90-1239PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
Based upon the stance of this matter relative to the contract between the parties for electrical services, it is understandable that some confusion existed as to the exact nature of the plaintiff’s claim. It does have the elements and characteristics of a common-law right to be asserted in tort or in contract; however, when the plaintiff’s complaint is viewed in the light of public policy considerations and pronouncements by the General Assembly and by this court, we must conclude that the trial court correctly dismissed it.
The General Assembly has created a broad and comprehensive statutory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Marketing Research Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Daily Advertiser v. TRANS-LA, ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- State ex rel. Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Allstate Insurance v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.