Legal Opinion

Lampl v. Latkanich

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1967No. Appeal, No. 16PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County awarding $5,580 to the plaintiff for legal services rendered.

Plaintiff Sanford M. Lampl is an attorney specializing in business and corporate law. Defendant Paul Latkanich was, until 1963, a substantial investor in the Bonita Corporation, a closely held company engaged in real estate speculation in Florida.

In January, 1959, Paul Latkanich employed the plaintiff to represent him and to protect his interest in the corporation. At that time, the corporation was overextended and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sundheim v. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. In Re WoodworthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Zawada v. Pennsylvania System Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. United Mercantile Agencies v. SlotskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Koenig v. FlahertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mager v. BultenaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Hiscott and Robinson v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Johnson v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Mulholland v. KernsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Geesey v. Albee Pennsylvania Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API