Legal Opinion

Mager v. Bultena

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2002PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, P.J.E.

¶ 1 These cross appeals have been taken from the judgment in the amount of $183,600.00 entered in favor of the law firm of Mager, Liebenberg and White, (hereinafter ML & W) and against the law firm of Salmanson and Falcao, LLC (hereinafter S & F or appellant) and its client, Lynn M. Bultena, in this litigation over counsel fees. We are constrained to reverse and remand for the entry of a judgment in conformity with Pennsylvania law.

¶ 2 This unseemly lawsuit was initiated by Carol Mager, Roberta Liebenberg, and Ann White, trading as the law firm of Mager, Liebenberg and White (ML…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. United States ex rel. Dick v. Long Island Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Richette v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Anderson v. Anchor Organization for Health MaintenanceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Styer v. HugoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Huber v. EtkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Ruby v. Abington Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Angino v. Jeffrey R. Lessin & AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API