Legal Opinion
Hiscott and Robinson v. King
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 22, 1993No. 39PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, Judge.
Appellant Hiscott and Robinson, a law firm, appeals from a directed verdict 1 in favor of appellee Jack F. King (King) in an action brought by Hiscott and Robinson to recover fees for services rendered before the firm was discharged by King. We affirm.
King was injured as a result of an automobile accident in September, 1987. King subsequently employed attorney William H. Robinson of Hiscott and Robinson to represent him in a personal injury action against the tortfeasor. Hiscott and Robinson provided King with a contingency fee agreement which provided that it would receive a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richette v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Butler v. Flo-Ron Vending Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Sundheim v. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Boyce v. Smith-Edwards-Dunlap Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Dorsett v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Phillips v. SeligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Kenis v. Perini Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Mager v. BultenaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Ryan v. Butera, Beausang, Cohen & BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Angino v. Jeffrey R. Lessin & AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.