Legal Opinion
Watson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 16, 1986No. Nos. 13796, 13815, 83-996 and 83-1150PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto indicating that the United States agrees that en banc rehearing should be granted, and it appearing that the majority of the *801judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED that appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of April 8, 1986, 508 A.2d 75, are hereby vacated. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the parties, on or before October 17, 1986, shall file supplemental memoranda on the question of whether Watson…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
4Cited by12 opinions
- Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Watson v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.