Legal Opinion
Doe v. Christie
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 31, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-6629PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs John Doe, a minor child by and through his parents Jack and Jane Doe, as well as Jack and Jane Doe, individually (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed this lawsuit against Defendant New Jersey Governor Christopher J. Christie (“Defendant” or “Governor Christie”), challenging the constitutionality of Assembly Bill Number A3371 (“A3371”) (codified at N.J.S.A. 45:1-54, -55),1 which prohibits New Jersey state licensed practitioners, who provide professional counseling services, from treating minors using methods of Sexual Orientation Change Efforts…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- King v. Governor of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Governor of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Otto v. City of Boca RatonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
- Andrew Kamal v. Femtosense, Inc. and Sam FokDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- Doyle v. HoganDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.