Legal Opinion

Andrew Kamal v. Femtosense, Inc. and Sam Fok

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 24, 2026No. 1:24-cv-00989Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE . ANDREW KAMAL, ) Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-989-GBW-SRF FEMTOSENSE, INC. and SAM FOK, Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Presently before the court in this patent infringement action are the following motions: (1) a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), filed by defendants Femtosense, Inc. and Sam Fok (together, “Defendants”),' (D.I. 40); (2) a motion for a stay of discovery and for a Rule 26(f) conference, filed by plaintiff Andrew Magdy Kamal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API