Legal Opinion

King v. Governor of the State of New Jersey

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 11, 2014No. 13-4429PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

A recently enacted statute in New Jersey prohibits licensed counselors from engaging in “sexual orientation change efforts” 1 with a client under the age of 18. Individuals and organizations that seek to provide such counseling filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, challenging this law as a violation of their First Amendment rights to free speech and free exercise of religion. Plaintiffs also asserted claims on behalf of their minor clients under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Court rejected Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. BecerraSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Albert Flora, Jr. v. County of LuzerneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. Seneca Resources Corp. v. Township of HighlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  4. Dr. Bernd Wollschlaeger v. Governor of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  5. American Beverage Assn. v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API