Legal Opinion
Halvorson v. United States
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided December 21, 1954No. 1078PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRIVER, District Judge.
Carl M. Halvorson, H. Halvorson and Howard Halvorson, as joint venturers, brought this action under the Tucker Act 1 to recover the reasonable value of materials and services furnished in the performance of a building construction contract. Howard Halvorson is now deceased, and his executor has been substituted as a party in his place, but for convenience the three Halvorsons will be referred to throughout this opinion as the plaintiffs.
The contract between the United States and plaintiffs was for the construction of certain buildings near Havre, Montana, at a place…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Continental Casualty Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. LundstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- New York Shipbuilding Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Fitzroy Gardiner, D/B/A Western Trading Enterprises v. Virgin Islands Water & Power Authority. Virgin Islands Water & Power Authority, Third-Party v. The Federal Emergency Management Agency the Army Corp of Engineers the United States Geological Society, Third-Party Virgin Islands Water & Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- City of El Centro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- City of El Centro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.