Legal Opinion
United States v. Lundstrom
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1943No. 10322PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
For the period herein concerned John G. and W. B. Lundstrom constitute a copartnership under the firm name and style of Western Auto Express. The copartners as plaintiffs in the district court were awarded a money judgment against the United States under the Tucker Act of March 3, 1887, c. 359, 24 Stat. 505, Title 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 41(20), for the reasonable value of services performed under a contract. The United States, defendant below, appeals claiming that nothing is owing to plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs appeal claiming that the award, under the evidence, should…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Utah, Nevada & California Stage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- United States v. National Wholesalers, a Corporation M-D Parts Manufacturing Company, National Parts Company and Henry MezoriCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Centex Construction Co., Inc. v. Worth James, D/B/A Worth James Construction Co., and the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Giustina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
- United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.