Legal Opinion
United States v. James Inendino
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 28, 1981No. 80-2519PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a question of first impression in this circuit which concerns the extent of a district court’s jurisdiction over a Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence. 2 We affirm the district court’s holding that it does not have jurisdiction to consider new evidence offered in a motion to reconsider denial of a Rule 35 motion filed beyond the 120-day limit in the rule.
On February 11, 1980, defendant-appellant James Inendino pled guilty to two counts of an indictment that charged a series of loansharking offenses. 3 He was sentenced on March 14, 1980,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Enrique Reyes Leyvas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Ersel StollingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Santiago Mario MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Santiago Mario MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. David Friedland, David J. Friedland, in No. 95-5582. David Friedland v. Douglas Lansing, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Ft. Dix, Nj United States Parole Commission David J. Friedland, in No. 95-5583. David Friedland v. United States of America, David J. Friedland, InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Robert L. Demier, Barbara Demier, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. FriedlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. Stojilko KajevicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Thomas D. Gaertner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.