United States v. Friedland
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
IRENAS, District Judge:
David Friedland has moved for reconsideration of his sentence pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. Rule 35(b) and has also petitioned the court for a writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Friedland argues that (i) the government failed to honor a commitment to move for a reduced sentence based on his substantial cooperation in pursuing other criminal investigations and (ii) the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) extended his incarceration beyond the date allowed by the parole guidelines contained in 28 C.F.R. § 2.20. Because the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. William Day, A/K/A William McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. David Friedland, David J. Friedland, in No. 95-5582. David Friedland v. Douglas Lansing, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Ft. Dix, Nj United States Parole Commission David J. Friedland, in No. 95-5583. David Friedland v. United States of America, David J. Friedland, InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. FriedlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. JulianoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Billy McMullin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- ALVAREZ v. N'DIAYEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.