Thomas D. Gaertner v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant Gaertner filed a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in the Eastern District of Wisconsin 119 days after the Supreme Court entered an order denying defendant a writ of certiorari on a direct appeal from his conviction. On July 25, 1984, 191 days after the Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari, the district court denied defendant’s Rule 35(b) motion on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction to reduce defendant’s sentence. Defendant appeals from the district court’s decision.1
I. THE…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ronald Romandine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. David M. BelangerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- William J. Politte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Raynard McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Brett C. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.