Legal Opinion

United States v. Santiago Mario Mendoza

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1978No. 77-1464PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Per curiam

Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides, in part, that:

The court may reduce a sentence within 120 days after the sentence is imposed, or within 120 days after receipt by the court of a mandate issued upon affirmance of the judgment or dismissal of the appeal

In this case, the district court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of a timely filed motion for reduced sentence because it had not ruled on the motion within 120 days of the issuance of a mandate affirming defendant’s narcotics conviction. A panel of this Court reversed, holding the district…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Santiago Mario MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Santiago Mario MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne WhitmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Houlihan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. United States v. Jose Luis Castro, Alberto Duque, Gaston Pereira, Jaime Bayon, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API