United States v. Santiago Mario Mendoza
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether a district court always loses jurisdiction to act upon a motion for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure at the expiration of the 120 day period provided by the rule. The issue is at the same time both intriguing and troubling, in part because, as the able Assistant United States Attorney candidly remarked at' oral argument, the words of the statute are so clearly in the government’s favor, yet there are so many cases supporting the defendant’s position. We agree with the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne WhitmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Houlihan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Terence D. Hughey v. Jms Development Corporation, Terrence D. Hughey v. Jms Development Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Jose Luis Castro, Alberto Duque, Gaston Pereira, Jaime Bayon, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.