Legal Opinion

Henning v. Akin

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1928No. Docket No. 5811PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, J., pro tem.

It is alleged in the complaint in this action that on or about the twenty-fifth day of June, 1923, plaintiff borrowed from the defendants the sum of $4,000, evidencing this loan with his promissory note for said sum, payable in 30 days, with interest at the rate of one per cent per month; that as security for the payment of said sum plaintiff indorsed and delivered to the defendants a certifi cate for 78.6 units of the White Star Oil Syndicate, the reasonable market value of which at that time was about $15,000. It is further alleged that on or about the twenty-seventh day…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Thompson v. TolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Edwards v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Horn v. KlattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Englert v. Ivac Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API