Legal Opinion
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Insurance Department
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stanley Parness, J.
Petitioner Consolidated Edison (Con Edison), by CPLR article 78, seeks to compel respondents to comply with petitioner’s *971request to examine certain documents in respondent’s possession relating to Northumberland Insurance Company (Northumberland), this pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) (Public Officers Law § 84 et seq.). Respondents now move to dismiss the petition.
In April 1984 Con Edison sustained certain losses which it contends were covered by Northumberland. In 1985 Northumberland U.S., a New York licensed carrier, became insolvent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Forsham v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- M. Farbman & Sons, Inc. v. New York City HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Washington Post Co. v. New York State Insurance DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Copeland v. SalomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moore v. SantucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Marks v. McKenzie High School Fact-Finding TeamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Fortgang v. Woodland Park ZooWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Kentucky Central Life Insurance Co. ex rel. Stephens v. Park Broadcasting of Kentucky, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
- In Re Liquidation of Integrity Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.