Legal Opinion

Fortgang v. Woodland Park Zoo

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2017No. 92846-1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCloud, J.

¶1 Petitioner Alyne Fortgang filed a request for documents concerning the elephants at the Woodland Park Zoo (Zoo). She filed that request under the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW, which requires every government “agency” to make records “available for [public] inspection and copying.” RCW 42.56.010, .040. But she filed it with the Woodland Park Zoo Society (WPZS), the private nonprofit that runs the Zoo. WPZS argues that the PRA can never reach the records of such a private entity.

¶2 We disagree. The PRA is “a strongly-worded mandate for open government,” Rental Hous. Ass’n of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Keck v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Memphis Publishing Co. v. Cherokee Children & Family Services, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Rental Housing Ass'n v. City of Des MoinesWashington Supreme Court · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lori Shavlik v. Dawson PlaceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. Serv. Emps. Int'l Union Local 925 v. Univ. of Wash.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
  3. All Natural Herbs, Llc, V. State Liquor And Cannabis BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. Assoc. Press v. Wash. State LegislatureWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Associated Press v. Wash. State LegislatureWashington Supreme Court · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API