Legal Opinion

Marks v. McKenzie High School Fact-Finding Team

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1994No. CC 92C-10440; CA A75255; SC S40517PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this action for injunctive relief, plaintiffs sought to inspect records maintained by defendant, a “fact-finding team” that had been selected by a private association of school administrators. The team allegedly was charged by a public school district board with investigating, reporting on, and making recommendations with respect to certain aspects of the operation of a high school within the district that had become the subject of public controversy. Only the team was named as defendant; neither the school district nor its board is a party to this litigation. The trial court dismissed the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Board of Trustees of Woodstock Academy v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Connecticut Humane Society v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Oksenholt v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. North Central Ass'n of Colleges & Schools v. Troutt Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Memphis Publishing Co. v. Cherokee Children & Family Services, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Oriana House, Inc. v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Telford v. Thurston County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Repository v. Nova Behavioral Health, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Town of Burlington v. Hospital Administrative District No. 1Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API